Dromm Testifies at Charter Revision Commission
Labels: Legislation
Daniel Dromm is working to make NYC a better place to live. Join us in making tomorrow better than today.
Labels: Legislation
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press, Youth
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press
From City Limits: By Abigail Kramer
Undocumented immigrant children who end up in foster care could take advantage of a wealth of opportunities, if only the agency responsible for them would do the paperwork. A green card, which grants permanent residency, and other substantial benefits are available to undocumented juveniles who are abused, neglected and abandoned – but only if they are given Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS).
Dozens of kids in the city's child welfare system have been identified as potentially eligible for the special status, but lawyers acting on their behalf fear that many more are simply overlooked. This week, City Council is scheduled to consider some ways to improve the situation.
In an appearance before the Council's Committee on Immigration earlier this month, the lawyers urged committee members to require that the city Administration for Children's Services develop a system-wide strategy for identifying undocumented children and helping them to get timely immigration assistance for SIJS. The window of eligibility is open only as long as undocumented children are in the child welfare system under ACS protection.
“We have no way of knowing how many kids are falling through cracks,” said Myra Elgabry, Director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at Lawyers for Children. "This is an opportunity they have a right to, and it absolutely ends at 21.”
Aging out of the system without being identified means the youngsters forfeit access to a privileged status – potentially including work programs and financial aid for college – that could improve their lives after leaving foster care. Missing the application deadline exposes them to the risk of deportation to their country of origin, a country they may not even remember.
The rationale for the special immigrant juvenile category is that abused, neglected or abandoned undocumented juveniles can't go back to their families. A Family Court judge must have already advised against reunification with one or both parents before the petition can be processed. Foster care agencies would identify undocumented kids and refer them to public service lawyers, who are funded by ACS to provide immigration counseling and file SIJS applications.
ACS Director of Immigrant Services Mark Lewis told Council members earlier this month that the department has recently taken significant steps to identify children who might be eligible for SIJS. In 2009, ACS began a file-by-file review of children in its care that turned up 110 previously unidentified, more than twice as many as discovered in a normal year, Lewis said. The newly discovered files will be referred to immigration counselors, he said.
Advocates say those numbers confirm why ACS needs to implement a standardized system for identifying SIJS-eligible children. Four legal aid groups asked the Council to make the bill more stringent, requiring ACS to hold mandatory training on immigration issues for case workers. They urged Council to mandate data systems that would allow the department to track immigration status. Two of the groups complained that for several years they had been asking ACS to no avail to add a “country of birth” field to children’s case files.
In an e-mail, ACS spokeswoman Sharman Stein said that the department “supports the intent” of the measure and “will work with the Council to come to an agreement on the best way to legislate the bill.”
“This is a human rights issue,” said Daniel Dromm, chair of the Council’s Immigration Committee and sponsor of the bill. “It’s what this country is supposed to be about: protecting the most vulnerable among us.”
Labels: ImmigrantRights, Legislation, Press, Progressive
From Crain's New York: By Daniel Massey
Legislation compelling employers to provide workers with up to nine paid sick days is scheduled to be reintroduced Thursday by Councilwoman Gale Brewer, setting the stage for a battle between business groups intent on killing, or at least gutting, the bill, and the labor-backed Working Families Party, which has made its passage a top priority.
The new bill is expected to contain changes from the one that was debated in the council last year—notably, a shift in the definition of a small business, from fewer than 10 employees to fewer than 20. The bill will require small businesses to give workers five sick days and larger ones to provide nine. Fines would be levied at a rate of $1,000 per violation.
“No one opposes the right of employees to stay home when they're sick without fear of retribution,” says Matthew Greller, an attorney at Tonio Burgos & Associates, who is lobbying against the bill. “But we don't think in this time in this recession should be proposing another unfunded mandate on businesses.”
Ms. Brewer's office insists the councilwoman has listened to the business community's reservations and incorporated their suggestions into the new bill—which is aimed at an estimated 1.5 million New York workers who get no paid sick time.
Due to shifts in council committee assignments and the election of Republicans to replace Tony Avella and John Liu, the bill is expected to have about 35 sponsors, compared with 39 the last time around. But several council newcomers who are members of the just-launched Progressive Caucus—including Jumaane Williams and Daniel Dromm— have replaced officials who were only lukewarm supporters of the idea. The caucus has made adoption of paid sick days one of its founding priorities.
Supporters of the legislation are expected to rally outside City Hall tomorrow to press for its passage. “President Obama's health care reform is a big leap forward, but if you're like the 48% of New York City's workers that can't take a day off without losing pay, seeing a doctor when you need to may still be impossible,” says a WFP spokesman.
Labels: Legislation, Press
Labels: CivilRights, ImmigrantRights, Legislation